Dallas Didn't Have Flagg. San Antonio Still Had Four Different Ways to Beat Them.
San Antonio Spurs
Dallas MavericksBrowse every NBA Week 1 article ↗
Wembanyama's rim protection, Harper's scoring and Fox-Castle playmaking powered a 122-106 Spurs win.
Dallas was missing Cooper Flagg after the shoulder sprain he suffered in Indiana, and Kyrie Irving was also held out for knee management. Those are legitimate absences, not some excuse invented after the final buzzer. But the Spurs still had to show up and handle business. They did, winning 122-106 on October 24 with the kind of balanced production that makes one defender's assignment feel impossible.
Victor Wembanyama led San Antonio with 23 points, seven rebounds and four blocks. He shot 9-for-18 and hit two threes, but his biggest influence wasn't just the scoring. Four blocks mean Dallas had to think twice about the paint, even on possessions where he never actually touched the ball. That's the difference between a center who puts up numbers and a defender who changes decisions.
Dylan Harper scored 22 on 9-for-18 shooting, including three triples. De'Aaron Fox added 19 points and nine assists, while Stephon Castle supplied 19 and eight assists. That's four Spurs with at least 19 points, and two guards nearly reaching double-digit assists. You can't load up on Wembanyama if Harper is scoring and both Fox and Castle are finding the next opening. The Spurs had 34 assists as a team.
Dallas was still competitive for stretches. The Mavericks trailed just 32-31 after one and were down 68-60 at halftime. They even won the third quarter 29-24 to pull within three entering the fourth. That matters because the final score can make this look like a start-to-finish beating. It wasn't. San Antonio separated when the game demanded one last stretch of disciplined execution.
Then came the fourth: Spurs 30, Mavericks 17. Seventeen points in a closing quarter is brutal when you're trying to erase a deficit. San Antonio stopped giving Dallas comfortable possessions, and the Mavericks didn't have the star creation to force the issue. Without Flagg and Irving, the burden on the remaining guards and wings was always going to be heavier. The fourth showed how quickly that burden can become too much.
Sergio de Larrea led Dallas with 21 points on 9-for-15 shooting and hit three of four threes. Daniel Gafford posted 12 points and nine rebounds; P.J. Washington also scored 12, and Marcus Sasser added 12 with five assists. I don't want those contributions dismissed just because Dallas lost. The problem was that no one consistently turned individual production into enough clean team offense late.
San Antonio made 15 threes to Dallas' eleven and grabbed 15 offensive rebounds. More important, the Spurs committed twelve turnovers while Dallas had eighteen. The Mavericks conceded 26 points off turnovers; San Antonio conceded twelve. That 14-point difference from giveaways alone is almost the entire 16-point final margin. When a team is shorthanded, wasting possessions is the fastest way to make the talent gap feel bigger.
My take: the easiest headline is 'Wemby beats injured Mavericks,' but that's too lazy for what San Antonio showed. Harper looked comfortable scoring, Fox and Castle moved the ball, and Wembanyama protected the rim. That's a team with multiple ways to punish you. I care about that more than one spectacular block that goes viral for 24 hours.
Dallas deserves context, not a free pass. Losing your reigning Rookie of the Year hurts, and having Irving out makes it worse. But the Mavericks were within three after the third and still produced only 17 in the fourth. There were winnable possessions available. The coaching staff has to find a better closing structure for nights when its primary creators aren't on the floor.
Next game, I'm watching whether San Antonio's 34-assist balance holds up against a healthier opponent and whether Dallas can reduce those turnovers while Flagg is reevaluated. One result won't define either team's season. The more useful lesson is that the Spurs' depth actually showed up, while the Mavericks' missing stars exposed a real late-game weakness.
6IX TAKE
6IX TAKE — Dallas had real absences, and pretending those do not matter would be lazy analysis. Still, the Spurs showed something meaningful beyond taking advantage of a depleted opponent. Four players scoring at least nineteen points and two guards creating for teammates means San Antonio had several ways to attack. Wembanyama's four blocks were important, but his influence also came from forcing Dallas to reconsider drives before they started. That changes the geometry of an offense. I would resist the temptation to use one October game as proof that San Antonio has arrived as a finished contender. What I do see is a roster with complementary strengths: interior deterrence, perimeter scoring, and multiple playmakers. Dallas can reasonably point to who was missing, but it should also recognize how quickly the Spurs exposed its available lineups. The biggest question for San Antonio is whether that balance survives tougher defensive opponents and closer fourth quarters. This was a promising performance, not a coronation.
Talk your shit.
Agree, disagree, add context, challenge the take. Keep it about the conversation.
Your account name stays attached to your comments, so nobody can just type your name and pretend to be you.