Philly Scored 13 in the Third, Then 39 in the Fourth. Explain That One.

Philadelphia scored 13 points in the third quarter, trailed Indiana by 13 with twelve minutes left, and still won 114–109. If that sounds like two separate games stitched together, that's because the 76ers' offense went from missing every useful answer to having several. Tyrese Maxey scored 27, including 17 in the fourth, while Joel Embiid, Jaylen Brown and Anfernee Simons supplied enough support to rescue a night that looked lost. Indiana won the third 36–13, then lost the fourth 39–21. That swing deserves more explanation than the word 'comeback.'

Indiana built a thirteen-point lead the hard way

At halftime the Sixers led 62–52. Their early scoring suggested they were in control, but the third quarter exposed how quickly that control could disappear. Indiana stepped up its defensive activity, and Philadelphia got stuck producing one bad possession after another. The Pacers entered the fourth ahead 88–75. A thirteen-point lead is not insurmountable in the modern NBA, but a team that has just held its opponent to thirteen points in a quarter should have enough confidence to finish the job. Indiana didn't.

Play video

6IXTV · ORIGINAL EMBED

Maxey turned the last ninety seconds into his show

Maxey's scoring in the fourth was the immediate difference. He made two three-pointers in the final ninety seconds, the second of which stretched Philadelphia's lead to 112–106 with 46 seconds remaining. That wasn't just a scorer piling up points in a decided game; it was the highest-leverage offensive production of the night. The Pacers needed one or two defensive stops to protect the advantage they'd earned. Instead, Maxey got enough space to take the air out of their comeback.

Maxey wasn't the only reason Philadelphia could recover. Embiid contributed 21 points and eleven rebounds; Brown added 20 and ten. Simons delivered 20 off the bench, including six three-pointers, while LeBron James posted 13 points and ten assists. That mix is important. One player can take over the closing stretch, but a team is more dangerous when it has threats who can keep the opponent honest before that stretch arrives. Philadelphia did not win with a single-man attack.

Indiana's late offense didn't survive the pressure

Indiana's Pascal Siakam scored 26 and grabbed eleven rebounds. Andrew Nembhard had 18 points and fourteen assists, which should have provided a structure for the offense even without Tyrese Haliburton, who was sidelined with a hamstring strain. The Pacers scored 50 in the paint to Philadelphia's 36, and both teams had stretches of productive ball movement. But Indiana shot just 25 percent from three, and the late offense could not supply the answer it needed once Maxey's shots started landing.

Play video

6IXTV · ORIGINAL EMBED

6IX TAKE — this comeback shouldn't excuse the collapse

6IX TAKE — I give Philadelphia credit for pulling this out, but let's not romanticize the mess. Scoring thirteen points in a quarter is an offensive collapse, and the fact that they later scored thirty-nine doesn't mean the first problem disappeared. The Sixers showed the value of having several players who can create a look when the first option gets denied. Maxey was brilliant at the end, Simons stretched the floor and the veterans gave the offense a foundation. Indiana's loss bothers me even more. You don't work that hard to manufacture a thirteen-point fourth-quarter lead, then allow the other team to decide the finish. The Pacers' poor three-point shooting is part of the story, but their response to Philadelphia's late pressure is the bigger concern. I want the coaching staff to identify the exact possessions where the offense stopped generating good chances. There are losses where the opponent simply beats you. This one feels like a lead Indiana helped give away.

Neither locker room should love this tape

The scoreline gives both teams the wrong opportunity for complacency. Philadelphia can point to the win and ignore the thirteen-point third quarter; Indiana can point to the dominant third and pretend the rest was bad luck. Neither reaction is good enough. The Sixers need a more consistent offense, and the Pacers need fourth-quarter decision-making that survives the other team's best punch.