Made with
floot.com
HIP-HOP • COURTS / HIP-HOP

Ye's Malibu House Already Cost a Fortune. Now the Court Just Added Another $181,000.

Tony Saxon's legal-fee award exceeds the jury damages he won. The latest order reveals how much an employment dispute can cost after trial.

XFacebook
Ye photographed at the 2019 Met Gala
Authentic archival photograph, not a photograph of this week's reported event. Wikimedia Commons / Ye at the 2019 Met Gala; photographer and license on source page ↗

That stripped-down Malibu mansion has been haunting Ye for years, and the latest court bill is another $181,433.93. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Brock Hammond ordered him to cover $147,000 in attorney fees and $34,433.93 in costs tied to former worker Tony Saxon's lawsuit. That's *in addition to* the $140,000 a jury awarded Saxon in March. The combined awards are roughly $321,000, before factoring in the bigger financial story surrounding the unfinished renovation.

The worker, the injuries and the judgment

Saxon says he worked on the renovation of the Tadao Ando-designed home and sustained neck and back injuries while there. In March, jurors awarded him damages, including medical expenses and pain and suffering. A jury verdict isn't a finding that every allegation in a lawsuit was true, and Ye has pursued an appeal. What's new now is the court's determination that Saxon's side can recover substantial legal fees and litigation costs.

Ye photographed at the 2019 Met Gala
Authentic archival photograph, not a photograph of this week's reported event. Cosmopolitan UK / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0; archival photo ↗

Rolling Stone obtained the ruling and reported that Saxon's attorneys sought more than $1.2 million in fees, while Ye's team argued for a much lower award. The judge didn't give either side everything it wanted. He settled on $181,433.93, which tells you how important it is to separate a legal demand from the amount actually awarded. Claims of 'Ye hit with a million-dollar legal-fee judgment' would be wrong.

Being rich doesn't make other people's labor invisible

Here's the thing that catches my eye: it is possible to spend absurd amounts on an architectural vision and still wind up in a fight over the ordinary workplace obligations that made the vision possible. A luxury renovation isn't built by a bank account floating over the ocean. Somebody is actually climbing ladders, managing people and taking physical risks. Those people aren't disposable just because the project is attached to a celebrity's name.

I don't need Ye's exact bank balance to know this bill isn't just 'another rich guy problem.' It grew from a dispute involving someone's health, work and compensation. Whether the appeal succeeds is for another day. For now, the court has issued a concrete order, and the worker's side secured far more than just the original jury award. If somebody's going to make headlines about losing money, at least explain what the money is for.

SOURCERolling Stone: court ruling and detailed award

Original reporting, court source, or primary account — full credit at the linked source.

SOURCEMyNewsLA: local court reporting

Original reporting, court source, or primary account — full credit at the linked source.

SOURCERealtor.com: underlying house renovation and damages

Original reporting, court source, or primary account — full credit at the linked source.

6IXTV
Share this take
XFacebook
THE CONVERSATION

Talk your shit.

Agree, disagree, add context, challenge the take. Keep it about the conversation.

0 comments
Sign in before you jump in.

Your account name stays attached to your comments, so nobody can just type your name and pretend to be you.

Sign in / create account
Loading the conversation…