Atlanta Beat Indiana by Two While Shooting 29% From Three. That's the Jalen Johnson Story.
Atlanta Hawks
Indiana PacersBrowse every NBA Week 2 article ↗
Jalen Johnson went 8-for-12 for 20 points as Atlanta survived Indiana 119–117 despite shooting 13-for-45 from deep. The Hawks' 52–46 edge in rebounds and Indiana's late push deserve a deeper look.
Atlanta beat Indiana 119–117 in preseason, but the part that caught me wasn't some miraculous late shot. It's the fact that the Hawks tried forty-five threes, made thirteen, and still came out with the win. Imagine shooting under 29 percent from deep and somehow having enough to beat a team that went 15-for-34. That's why I don't judge basketball by who had the prettier highlight.
Jalen Johnson gave Atlanta 20 points on 8-for-12 shooting, grabbed seven rebounds and finished with three assists in just under twenty-five minutes. He didn't have to put up forty or force every possession. I wanna see more of that: a star who knows when to attack, who isn't making the whole offense wait for one guy to get hot.

October 10 preseason | Hawks 119 — Pacers 117
- JALEN JOHNSON
- 20 pts7 reb3 ast8/12 FG
- ONYEKA OKONGWU
- 18 pts6/6 FT
- ATL 3-POINT SHOOTING
- 13/4528.9%
- IND 3-POINT SHOOTING
- 15/3444.1%
- REBOUNDS
- Atlanta 52Indiana 46
- TURNOVERS
- Atlanta 14Indiana 17
Atlanta was better where the numbers aren't always sexy
Indiana shot 51.3 percent overall. That's a stronger raw shooting percentage than Atlanta, and the Pacers also had a better night beyond the arc. So why did Atlanta win? Possessions matter. The Hawks grabbed more rebounds, finished with fewer turnovers, and had already built a cushion when Indiana started its late push.
Atlanta led 96–86 after three quarters. Indiana then outscored it 31–23 in the fourth. That tells me the Hawks had enough productive minutes early to survive not closing perfectly, but it also says nobody in Atlanta should be satisfied with the way they finished.
And those forty-five three-point attempts? I'd absolutely want a coach to look at the shot chart. Some are going to be good, open attempts that just miss. Others are bad decisions that give the opponent a quick possession. Without watching and grading the actual attempts, I can't call every miss a bad shot.
Johnson's efficiency is a different kind of star performance
Johnson got those twenty points without needing an unusually high volume of shots. He made both three-point attempts and eight of twelve overall. That's a lot different than someone who fires thirty shots and gets a headline because the final number happens to look big.
Onyeka Okongwu gave Atlanta eighteen, including a perfect six-for-six at the line. Aaron Wiggins added thirteen. CJ McCollum contributed twelve, and the Hawks had other guys filling in the gaps. You can build a useful preseason story around that type of support rather than treating every possession as a referendum on one star.
I also like that Johnson had seven rebounds. If you're supposed to be an important piece of a team's identity, the non-scoring possessions are part of the evaluation. You don't get to switch off every time the ball isn't in your hands.
Indiana made its own argument
The Pacers weren't playing some perfect game, but they fought back. Pascal Siakam and Kelly Oubre Jr. scored thirteen apiece, while Jalen Slawson contributed twelve. They made shots from outside and finished the fourth quarter with a real chance to steal it.
Where Indiana left itself work was the early separation. When you're down ten entering the final twelve minutes, winning the fourth by eight still leaves you short. That's simple math, but it's exactly what people forget when they only watch the final highlights.
And Indiana's seventeen turnovers don't disappear just because the shooters were hot. When you're playing a team that collects second chances and takes care of the ball a little better, you're eventually giving up the possessions that might have flipped a two-point loss.
My take
This isn't me saying Atlanta solved its shooting problems or Indiana's season is in trouble. It's preseason. I wanna see the process keep showing up when the actual games matter. Johnson playing efficiently is a good sign, and rebounding with some discipline is something that can carry over.
But the closeout is still a problem. If you give a good offensive team that much space in the fourth, two points can disappear in one possession. Atlanta got away with it here. You can't make a habit of needing the opponent to run out of time.
You can shoot like shit from three and still win the game. The trick is not playing like shit everywhere else.6ix / 6ixtv
Atlanta deserves the W. Johnson deserves credit. Indiana deserves some respect for the fight. Now show me which of those habits survive when the starters actually play full minutes.
Check the actual box score and footage
NBA GAME CENTERHawks at Pacers — October 10 official box scoreLeague source for final score, teams and video.
DETAILED BOXSports Illustrated: Hawks 119, Pacers 117Quarter splits, player lines and three-point shooting.
OFFICIAL RECAP VIDEONBA: Hawks vs. Pacers full game recapReal league-hosted October 10 video and game-specific thumbnail.
GAME VIDEO / FOURTH QUARTERNBA: Pacers' fourth-quarter highlightsLeague footage of Indiana's late push.
Talk your shit.
Agree, disagree, add context, challenge the take. Keep it about the conversation.
Your account name stays attached to your comments, so nobody can just type your name and pretend to be you.