Everybody's Watching the Roadster While Tesla's Energy Business Makes Real Moves

Play video

6IXTV · ORIGINAL EMBED

Everybody was watching Elon Musk make a Roadster do a damn backflip, and meanwhile the part of Tesla that actually helps keep the lights on just lost one of its top executives. Now that's a story worth talking about. According to an October 15 Wall Street Journal report, Mike Snyder stepped down as Tesla's vice president of energy and charging. Reuters followed up but said it couldn't independently verify the change and Tesla hadn't immediately commented. So I'm not about to turn 'reportedly departed' into 'fired,' 'pushed out' or some secret drama nobody has evidence for.

The report says Snyder joined Tesla in 2014, moved up through the Megapack industrial battery operation and became a vice president in 2024. AJ Booth, who has been senior director of energy products engineering, is reportedly taking over. Twelve years at one company, through leadership changes and a major new line of business, makes Snyder a significant figure to lose. But his departure by itself doesn't prove the energy division is falling apart. It means the guy helping run it is apparently out, and the company will have to show whether the next team can deliver.

Play video

6IXTV · ORIGINAL EMBED

Here's what doesn't get nearly enough attention: Tesla said it deployed 13.7 gigawatt-hours of energy-storage products in the third quarter of 2026. That's an actual reported operating figure, not a promise from a product reveal. For comparison, Tesla reported 12.5 GWh in the same quarter of 2025 and 13.5 GWh in the second quarter of 2026. The year-over-year increase is about 9.6 percent. There's your growth story. Not hypothetical future customers — storage capacity deployed during the quarter.

But there's a distinction some headlines conveniently skip: deployed energy capacity is not the same as revenue, profit or cash collected. Tesla's next quarterly earnings report isn't due until October 21. If somebody takes 13.7 GWh and automatically calls it 13.7 billion dollars, they're talking straight out of their ass. What the deployment figure tells us is that Tesla is putting substantial battery capacity into the field. Whether it can do that profitably and consistently is another question.

And these batteries aren't just giant versions of something you plug in beside your house. Megapack is industrial-scale storage for utilities, developers and big energy users. It can store electricity when supply is plentiful, then release it when demand rises. That can help solar and wind power line up with the hours people actually need electricity, and it can provide fast grid support. It doesn't create electricity out of nothing. It's infrastructure that helps use generated power more efficiently.

Play video

6IXTV · ORIGINAL EMBED

The manufacturing part matters too. Tesla builds these massive storage systems at Megafactories, including Lathrop, California. Scaling the operation takes more than a big presentation: battery supplies, reliable equipment, engineers, workers, logistics, safety systems, customers and maintenance. That's why a management change at this division deserves attention. Industrial customers don't give a shit about a viral tweet when the project they're paying for needs to be on schedule.

There’s also a connection to all these AI data centers people are talking about. Data centers use a ton of power and often care about keeping it reliable every hour of the day. Batteries can help manage that demand alongside other grid infrastructure. Reuters says Tesla has been expanding industrial battery sales to that market. That doesn't mean every data center in America is about to buy Megapacks, and it definitely doesn't mean batteries can replace every power plant. It means energy storage has real customers and real applications worth following.

And let's not act like one company deserves a monopoly on the idea. Utility storage has serious competition, technology trade-offs and regulatory challenges. Those projects still need financing, permits, grid connections and long-term performance that customers trust. Tesla is selling hardware, software and ongoing services in a market where delays or failures can be expensive as hell. My question isn't whether the machines look futuristic. It's whether the operation can scale without sacrificing the basics.

Play video

6IXTV · ORIGINAL EMBED

One number puts the scale in perspective. Reuters reported energy made up about 11 percent of Tesla's total revenue in the first half of 2026, compared with roughly 70 percent from the automotive side. Energy is smaller, yes. But it isn't some random accessory business anymore. And because Tesla's public image is so tied to Musk, it's easy to forget a whole workforce is delivering complicated infrastructure behind the scenes.

Now, the Journal also reported a proposed Texas solar-factory investment around $10 billion. Proposed is the important word. I'm not calling it a completed factory, a signed contract or a guaranteed investment. Same rule applies to Snyder: if the reason for his exit hasn't been established, don't invent one. The story already has enough substance without making shit up.

I can think Tesla's Roadster reveal was cool and still believe this is the more important business to watch. One demonstration made a car jump. This division is deploying enormous amounts of storage on electric grids right now. Leadership continuity, construction schedules, cost, performance and the October 21 financial results will tell us whether that's becoming a stronger business. That's where my attention is. The backflipping car can have the timeline.